The United States and Iran remain at odds over a ceasefire proposal after President Donald Trump rejected Iran's latest response, according to reports. Iran delivered its reply to Pakistani mediators on Sunday, the state-run Islamic Republic News Agency confirmed.

Pakistan's role as a go-between is notable. Islamabad has positioned itself as a back-channel link between Washington and Tehran at a moment when direct diplomatic contact between the two governments remains effectively frozen. The use of a third-party mediator signals both sides are willing to communicate, but the gap between their positions appears wide enough that Trump felt the response warranted outright rejection.

Where Things Stand

Details of Iran's specific response and the terms of the original U.S. ceasefire proposal have not been made public. What is confirmed is that Trump found Iran's answer unacceptable. The nature of any counter-offer, timeline, or next diplomatic step has not been disclosed in available reporting.

The broader backdrop matters here. U.S.-Iran tensions have been elevated for years, spanning nuclear negotiations, regional proxy conflicts, and sanctions pressure. A ceasefire proposal suggests at least a narrow channel of communication exists, but Trump's rejection of Iran's response means that channel has not yet produced agreement.

What to Watch

The next move rests with both parties. Iran could revise its position and send a new response through Pakistani intermediaries, or it could hold firm. The U.S. could clarify its terms or signal a willingness to negotiate further. Whether Pakistan continues in an active mediation role, or whether another diplomatic pathway opens, will determine how quickly, or whether, talks progress.

For markets and regional observers, the stalled exchange keeps uncertainty elevated around oil supply routes and broader Middle East stability, both of which carry direct consequences for energy prices and global risk appetite.