Iran has sent a formal response to a US proposal aimed at ending the war, using Pakistan as a diplomatic go-between, according to reports. The response marks a concrete step in what appears to be a back-channel negotiation process between Washington and Tehran.

What the Proposal Covers

The US proposal, as reported, would focus initial negotiations on ending hostilities, suggesting a phased approach where a ceasefire or halt to fighting comes first, before broader political issues are tackled. Pakistan's role as mediator reflects its position as a country that maintains functional diplomatic ties with both the United States and Iran, making it a practical choice for shuttling messages between two governments that have no direct diplomatic relations.

Why This Matters

Back-channel diplomacy of this kind is significant because it signals both sides are at least willing to test the other's intentions. The use of a third-party mediator, rather than direct talks, also suggests neither government is ready to engage publicly, likely due to domestic political constraints on both sides.

Pakistan taking on this role carries its own weight. Islamabad has been navigating a complex foreign policy environment, balancing relationships with the US, China, Gulf states, and Iran simultaneously. Acting as a conduit in a potential US-Iran de-escalation could raise Pakistan's diplomatic profile but also exposes it to pressure if talks collapse.

The specifics of Iran's response have not been disclosed. Whether Tehran accepted, rejected, or offered counter-terms to the US proposal remains unclear from available reporting. The limited detail makes it difficult to assess how close, or how far, the two sides actually are.

Watch for whether a follow-up round of messages is confirmed, whether any third country joins the mediation framework, and whether either the US or Iran makes a public statement that signals the tone of the exchange.