Iran has sent its formal response to the latest U.S. ceasefire proposal through Pakistani mediators, state-run Iranian media reported Sunday. Tehran says it wants any negotiations to focus on permanently ending the war, not a temporary pause in fighting.

The use of Pakistan as an intermediary reflects the absence of direct diplomatic channels between Washington and Tehran. Pakistan has maintained working relationships with both countries, making it a practical go-between at a moment when back-channel communication is essential.

What Iran's Position Means

By insisting on a permanent end to the war as the framework for talks, Iran is signaling it will not accept a short-term ceasefire that leaves the underlying conflict unresolved. This is a higher bar than a simple halt to hostilities and could complicate or slow negotiations if the U.S. position differs on scope or timeline.

The headline reference to drones targeting Gulf nations suggests the broader regional conflict is still active, with aerial attacks continuing even as diplomatic signals are being exchanged. This combination of military pressure and diplomatic outreach is a common pattern in protracted conflicts, where parties negotiate while fighting continues.

What to Watch

The key questions now are whether the U.S. has responded to Iran's conditions, what specific terms Tehran is demanding for a permanent settlement, and whether Gulf states hosting U.S. military assets face continued drone threats in the interim. Any shift in the U.S. posture toward permanent settlement language would mark a significant change from prior ceasefire frameworks. The involvement of Pakistani mediators also bears watching, as their role could expand or face pressure depending on how talks develop.

Iran's response was transmitted via Pakistani mediators, not direct talks.
Tehran's stated goal is a permanent end to the war, not a temporary ceasefire.
Drone attacks on Gulf nations are reportedly continuing alongside diplomacy.