Key Takeaways
May 9, 2026 · 3 min read · By Rishabh Bhardwaj
·
AI-assisted, human-reviewed · Our editorial standards
India's markets regulator SEBI has proposed a significant overhaul of the rules governing share buybacks, the process by which listed companies repurchase their own shares from the open market or existing shareholders. The regulator has opened the proposals for public comment, signalling that formal rule changes could follow once feedback is reviewed.
The proposals cover several fronts. On compliance, SEBI wants to simplify the paperwork and procedural burden companies currently face when executing buybacks. One notable suggestion is removing the mandatory requirement to appoint a merchant banker, a registered financial intermediary who currently oversees the buyback process. Cutting this requirement would reduce cost and friction for companies, particularly smaller ones, though it also removes a layer of independent oversight.
SEBI also wants companies to communicate more clearly with shareholders during buybacks. Currently, shareholders may not always have a full picture of a buyback's terms, timeline, or impact on their holdings. Better disclosure would help investors make more informed decisions about whether to tender their shares or hold.
A third area of focus is preventing companies from breaching minimum public shareholding norms through buybacks. Listed companies in India are required to maintain a minimum level of shares in public hands, currently 25% for most companies. A poorly structured buyback can inadvertently push promoter shareholding above permissible limits, reducing the public float and potentially affecting stock liquidity. SEBI's proposal aims to close this gap with clearer guardrails.
Buybacks have become a common capital return tool for Indian corporates, especially in sectors like technology and financial services where companies generate significant cash. Any rule change affects how and when companies can return capital to shareholders, which in turn affects stock valuations, earnings per share calculations, and overall market sentiment around cash-rich companies.
Simplifying the process could encourage more frequent buybacks, potentially providing a floor of demand for shares during market downturns. On the other hand, removing mandatory merchant banker oversight raises questions about whether smaller or less experienced management teams will execute buybacks in a way that treats all shareholders fairly.
The public comment process means the final rules may look different from what SEBI has proposed. Market participants, including institutional investors, listed companies, and merchant bankers themselves, are likely to weigh in, particularly on the oversight question.
Watch for the comment deadline and whether SEBI narrows or widens the merchant banker requirement based on feedback. The final rules will set the compliance template for buybacks across all listed Indian companies.
The Supreme Court blocked Trump from firing Federal Reserve board member Lisa Cook, preserving the Fed's independence from presidential removal power. A separate ruling the same day gave Trump broader authority to dismiss leaders of other independent federal agencies.
The US Supreme Court has blocked President Trump's attempt to fire Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook, who faced unproven mortgage fraud allegations. The ruling preserves Fed independence for now and keeps a politically charged removal case alive in the courts.
The US Supreme Court, splitting along ideological lines, has allowed the Trump administration to end Temporary Protected Status for Haitian and Syrian immigrants.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against TPS protections in a case centered on Haitian migrants, leaving 1.3 million people from over a dozen countries vulnerable to deportation. Many affected individuals have lived legally in the U.S. for decades, with the ruling removing a key legal shield used to resist removal.