House Speaker Mike Johnson said Thursday that Congress does not need to vote on the Trump administration's military actions involving Iran because the U.S. is 'not at war.' Johnson, a Republican from Louisiana, argued there is no 'active, kinetic military bombing, firing or anything like that,' framing current actions as below the threshold that would require a congressional authorization. The statement matters because U.S. law, specifically the War Powers Resolution, requires the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing forces to hostilities and limits unauthorized military engagement to 60 days without congressional approval. Johnson's position is that current actions do not meet that bar. The timing is notable. Johnson made the remarks as a key deadline was approaching, though the specific nature of that deadline is not detailed in available reporting. His framing effectively shields the executive branch from a mandatory congressional vote, at least for now. Watch for whether Congress pushes back on this interpretation, and whether any escalation in U.S.-Iran activity forces a harder legal question about war powers authority.
The Supreme Court blocked Trump from firing Federal Reserve board member Lisa Cook, preserving the Fed's independence from presidential removal power. A separate ruling the same day gave Trump broader authority to dismiss leaders of other independent federal agencies.
The US Supreme Court has blocked President Trump's attempt to fire Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook, who faced unproven mortgage fraud allegations. The ruling preserves Fed independence for now and keeps a politically charged removal case alive in the courts.
The US Supreme Court, splitting along ideological lines, has allowed the Trump administration to end Temporary Protected Status for Haitian and Syrian immigrants.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against TPS protections in a case centered on Haitian migrants, leaving 1.3 million people from over a dozen countries vulnerable to deportation. Many affected individuals have lived legally in the U.S. for decades, with the ruling removing a key legal shield used to resist removal.
