President Donald Trump said the ceasefire between the US and Iran is still "in effect," even as Iran accused the US of breaking it by striking Iranian vessels and coastal areas.

The public contradiction puts the fragile truce under immediate pressure. Iran's accusation centers on two specific actions: US targeting of Iranian naval vessels and strikes on coastal territory. Neither side has backed down from its position, leaving the status of the ceasefire genuinely contested.

What Each Side Is Claiming

Trump's statement is a direct assertion that no breach has occurred from the US side. Iran's government says the opposite — that US military action after the ceasefire was announced constitutes a violation of its terms. The gap between the two positions is not a matter of interpretation; each side is describing the same post-ceasefire period in fundamentally different terms.

The specific incidents Iran is pointing to — vessel targeting and coastal strikes — suggest kinetic military activity continued on the ground even as a diplomatic agreement was being communicated publicly. Whether those actions preceded or followed the formal ceasefire window is the critical factual dispute.

Why This Matters

Ceasefire credibility depends on both parties accepting the same baseline of what happened and when. When one side declares a violation and the other denies it, the agreement loses its enforcing logic. There is no named third-party mediator or verification mechanism mentioned in the available reporting, which makes resolving the factual dispute harder.

Markets sensitive to Middle East tensions — particularly oil — typically react to signals of whether a ceasefire is holding or collapsing. A contested truce, where military activity is disputed rather than clearly stopped, is treated differently than a confirmed pause. Energy prices and regional risk premiums will likely track how this dispute develops over the next 24 to 48 hours.

Watch for whether either government provides specific timestamps or evidence for the incidents in question, whether a third party steps in to verify the ceasefire timeline, and whether further military activity is reported on either side.