An Iranian lawmaker has declared that the Strait of Hormuz will never return to its pre-war status, signaling that Tehran intends to use the critical waterway as a lasting pressure point following the US-Israel conflict with Iran.

The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world's most important oil chokepoints. Roughly 20% of global oil supply passes through the narrow passage between Iran and Oman, connecting the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea. Any sustained disruption there directly affects crude prices, shipping insurance costs, and energy security for major importers including China, India, Japan, and South Korea.

What the Statement Signals

The lawmaker's comments stop short of announcing a blockade or specific new restrictions, but the framing — that a prior baseline no longer applies — suggests Iran is positioning itself to justify new rules of passage, higher military presence, or selective interference with vessel traffic. That ambiguity is itself a market signal: oil traders and shipping companies price uncertainty, not just confirmed disruptions.

Iran has previously threatened to close the strait during periods of high tension, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has the naval capability to harass, board, or seize vessels in the waterway. The current statement raises the question of whether Tehran plans to formalize or escalate that posture rather than return to a tacit understanding of free passage.

Why This Matters Beyond Oil

India is directly exposed. It imports a significant share of its crude from Gulf producers whose exports transit Hormuz, and Indian-flagged or Indian-chartered vessels operate in these waters. A sustained change in the strait's operational status would affect India's import costs, energy inflation, and the pace of any freight recovery.

Globally, a shift in Hormuz's status would pressure insurers to reprice war-risk premiums on tankers, push shipping firms toward longer alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope, and potentially accelerate conversations among Gulf states about pipeline alternatives that bypass the strait entirely.

The statement comes from a single lawmaker and carries no confirmed policy detail or enforcement mechanism yet. But given Iran's track record of using the strait as leverage, markets and governments will be watching closely for any follow-up from the executive or military leadership that adds operational weight to this political signal.